SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)解讀之邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)
SAT寫(xiě)作考試的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和其他的選擇題是完全不同的,想要在SAT寫(xiě)作考試中取得好成績(jī),大家需要對(duì)SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有一個(gè)詳細(xì)的掌握,對(duì)于各項(xiàng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的準(zhǔn)確含義都進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的了解。下面為大家解析一下關(guān)于邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)方面的內(nèi)容吧。
SAT寫(xiě)作6分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)里第一個(gè)項(xiàng)目:effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position.
從這里我們可以看到,SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)最強(qiáng)調(diào)和重視的是眾考生的邏輯思維以及他們對(duì)特定事物的思辨性的考慮。
Insight是指大家對(duì)事物深入而深刻的看法,中文可以理解成洞察力。Critical thinking則是辯證性的思考。
Using clearly appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position是要大家用例子,理由或者其他證據(jù)去證明自己的觀點(diǎn)。
需要注意的是在例子、理由和證據(jù)前面有一個(gè)clearly,也就是說(shuō)考官的要求是要大家清晰的表達(dá)自己的看法。這個(gè)清晰其實(shí)就是強(qiáng)調(diào)大家的一種邏輯性。例子理由要與你的觀點(diǎn)密切相關(guān)。例子理由如何支撐文章的觀點(diǎn)要非常清晰的得以體現(xiàn)。
這篇SAT寫(xiě)作的題目是:Do circumstances determine whether or not people should tell the truth.
我們來(lái)看一篇習(xí)作的開(kāi)頭段:
In our world, truth and lie exist in a way the same as that of the black and white. Its obviously for us to see that one of them is opposite to the other. So many people think directly that they are not same at all. But in fact, they are the same things in the whole, because both of them are little parts compared to the integration. Their function is to make the integration execute fluently and effective, which can benefit more people. So my idea is that truth or lie is just a kind of formation. What determines our choice is the result can really help people rather than tangle with the apparent formation.
我們看到上面的習(xí)作中有一些邏輯連接詞so,but,because等。明顯的,在這一段中,學(xué)生的邏輯非?;靵y??吹降谝粋€(gè)批注中的內(nèi)容: 注意此處的邏輯關(guān)系。明顯的他們有區(qū)別,但是,一些人。。注意是轉(zhuǎn)折應(yīng)該用however或者but等。但是,再接著看到后面一句你用的but,也就是說(shuō)前面不能用轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系了,要改用although的讓步關(guān)系。而且,后面解釋的時(shí)候已經(jīng)表達(dá)了第一段第二句的意思,所以建議刪掉第二句話(huà)。
再來(lái)看一下修改后的開(kāi)頭段:
In our world, truth and lie exist in a way the same as that of the black and white. So many people consider that they are not the same at all. In fact, both of them are parts of the integration. That is, they are the same things. And the reason of their existence is that it can supply more ways for people to release their emotion. As far as I am concerned, I vote that people dont have to always tell the truth, because sometimes it can hurt people, whom maybe you would have helped. 修改后的內(nèi)容在表達(dá)上清晰了許多。
從上面的例子中,我們可以清晰的看到邏輯結(jié)構(gòu),這個(gè)SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是如何規(guī)范考試的。大家可以在自己平時(shí)練習(xí)的時(shí)候,對(duì)上面所列的這些內(nèi)容進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)膮⒖己徒梃b。
SAT寫(xiě)作考試的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和其他的選擇題是完全不同的,想要在SAT寫(xiě)作考試中取得好成績(jī),大家需要對(duì)SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有一個(gè)詳細(xì)的掌握,對(duì)于各項(xiàng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的準(zhǔn)確含義都進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的了解。下面為大家解析一下關(guān)于邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)方面的內(nèi)容吧。
SAT寫(xiě)作6分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)里第一個(gè)項(xiàng)目:effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position.
從這里我們可以看到,SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)最強(qiáng)調(diào)和重視的是眾考生的邏輯思維以及他們對(duì)特定事物的思辨性的考慮。
Insight是指大家對(duì)事物深入而深刻的看法,中文可以理解成洞察力。Critical thinking則是辯證性的思考。
Using clearly appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position是要大家用例子,理由或者其他證據(jù)去證明自己的觀點(diǎn)。
需要注意的是在例子、理由和證據(jù)前面有一個(gè)clearly,也就是說(shuō)考官的要求是要大家清晰的表達(dá)自己的看法。這個(gè)清晰其實(shí)就是強(qiáng)調(diào)大家的一種邏輯性。例子理由要與你的觀點(diǎn)密切相關(guān)。例子理由如何支撐文章的觀點(diǎn)要非常清晰的得以體現(xiàn)。
這篇SAT寫(xiě)作的題目是:Do circumstances determine whether or not people should tell the truth.
我們來(lái)看一篇習(xí)作的開(kāi)頭段:
In our world, truth and lie exist in a way the same as that of the black and white. Its obviously for us to see that one of them is opposite to the other. So many people think directly that they are not same at all. But in fact, they are the same things in the whole, because both of them are little parts compared to the integration. Their function is to make the integration execute fluently and effective, which can benefit more people. So my idea is that truth or lie is just a kind of formation. What determines our choice is the result can really help people rather than tangle with the apparent formation.
我們看到上面的習(xí)作中有一些邏輯連接詞so,but,because等。明顯的,在這一段中,學(xué)生的邏輯非?;靵y。看到第一個(gè)批注中的內(nèi)容: 注意此處的邏輯關(guān)系。明顯的他們有區(qū)別,但是,一些人。。注意是轉(zhuǎn)折應(yīng)該用however或者but等。但是,再接著看到后面一句你用的but,也就是說(shuō)前面不能用轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系了,要改用although的讓步關(guān)系。而且,后面解釋的時(shí)候已經(jīng)表達(dá)了第一段第二句的意思,所以建議刪掉第二句話(huà)。
再來(lái)看一下修改后的開(kāi)頭段:
In our world, truth and lie exist in a way the same as that of the black and white. So many people consider that they are not the same at all. In fact, both of them are parts of the integration. That is, they are the same things. And the reason of their existence is that it can supply more ways for people to release their emotion. As far as I am concerned, I vote that people dont have to always tell the truth, because sometimes it can hurt people, whom maybe you would have helped. 修改后的內(nèi)容在表達(dá)上清晰了許多。
從上面的例子中,我們可以清晰的看到邏輯結(jié)構(gòu),這個(gè)SAT寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是如何規(guī)范考試的。大家可以在自己平時(shí)練習(xí)的時(shí)候,對(duì)上面所列的這些內(nèi)容進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)膮⒖己徒梃b。